Brand New Layouts with CSS Subgrid
This is the first article that made me actually understand the use cases for CSS subgrid. Iām still not fully convinced Iām gonna use them often, but itās nice to understand what problems they solve.
Cool links are a collection of interesting things I find around the web. They can range from fun dumb websites to deep thought-provoking essays, or more commonly something in between. The feed here updates frequently, and I compile everything into a blog post on the last day of each month.

10 links from November 2025
Brand New Layouts with CSS Subgrid
This is the first article that made me actually understand the use cases for CSS subgrid. Iām still not fully convinced Iām gonna use them often, but itās nice to understand what problems they solve.
LLMs are bullshitters. But that doesn't mean they're not useful
⦠wow. This is an amazing article that goes a bit into how LLMs work (is an easy-to-understand way), how flawed they are, and how useful they can be. Or dangerous.
Plus, the nurse and surgeon examples are hilarious.
The birth & death of search engine optimization
This article walks through how the concept of SEO (Search Engine Optimization) was born, how it inevitably became broken and how easy it is to āwinā it, as long as your content is made up and not actual real information.
The perils of doors in gamedev
This Mastodon thread is an amazing tale about game development, physics and time-traveling bugs.
Conditional Border Radius In CSS
This is a really cool trick. Turns out that itās possible, with pure CSS, to have border-radius be applied conditionally.
The given example is a perfect one: sometimes we have cards with rounded corners that look good on their own, but if youāre on mobile and have less space and want the cards to take up the full page width, the rounded corners look awful. You can technically write breakpoints for that, but with clamp you can make the border-radius disappear if the card is too close to the viewport edges!
Solved By Modern CSS: Section Layout
In this awesome post, Ahmad walks through all the possibilities modern CSS offers when building a section layout.
I knew about and have used some of those in the past, but that tip about display: contents was amazing! Never thought of using it like that.
Is software getting worse? - Stack Overflow
This article has been sitting in my āRead Laterā queue for almost 2 years š³
It is an interesting article for sure, speaking about why speed and optimization has become such a rare thing in software development.
The second part of it, though, has kinda aged like milk, sadly. Developers no longer have a lot of leverage on their jobs, and we now live in a world where the thought of having no human developers involved at all in the code Iām running is real and frankly terrifying.
Iām hopeful companies will eventually figure out that AI-generated crap is still crap when the bubble bursts, but until then, thereās a lot of damage to be done.
Great and to-the-point article with practical examples of when to use (or not use) animations properly in UIs.
I love me some whooshy animations, but they can be a pain in the ass when overused or when used in the wrong moment.
Introducing SlopStop: Community-driven AI slop detection
This is a really cool initiative! Kagi has been my search engine of choice for over a year and Iām really happy with how theyāre aiming to stop AI slop from taking over their (still great) search results.
In my experience, their results are miles ahead of Googleās, Bingās or whatever other search engine out there, partly because of their algorithm prioritizes good sites, partly because they allow you to prioritize/deprioritize/block the sites you want.
But a good algorithm only goes so far and with the amount of AI slop hitting the web every day, itās gonna be harder and harder to avoid them. Now Kagi users can report certain articles as AI-generated so other users can know that beforehand and not click on them, or even block their domains.
The ādiv vs buttonā debate was never really a debate because one of the sides is objectively wrong, but this is still a good post to remind you of why it was never a debate in the first place.